CO129-627-4 Argyle Street explosion- correspondence on claims and enquiries 1-6-1946 - 31-7-1951 — Page 66

4th reference to the particular questione sed by yu unk: peragregh 3 1.

(1, bea not rally arios bocause the military did in foot interfere with the tunnel but it has alr·:ody bian me:ered by my paragraph 3,

(ii; Tháo hoa already been answered by -y paragraph54 and 5.

(134) Jae my para re h 3.

(iv

In ry view it would not have been sufficient to sam the civilian population but it was the lost that could have been done

(♥, (me my paragraph 4,

he liability of the r

7, I have not dealt with the question of Departent for the negligene of its servanta beoma: 1 hav: «ssu od that there is no question of wishing to deny legal res onsibility on

is ground.

I have the honour to be,

348,

Your obedient Jervant,

Osorg

Jorge

brickland.

\øting Attorney General.

66